The behavior of short term, as Sennett (1998: 67) observed, distorted any sense of reality, confidence and mutual comprometimento. The companies discard its employees and the ones that can make the same. The people more seem not to be worried about the meaning of its work or about the chance of experience and collective exchange. The concern is turned toward accumulation of a value of exchange, as if all were become into an action of market, whose price is judged by outrem. The true identification with the work seems to live of an objective that does not arrive to materialize itself: one accumulates learning, money, experience; it increases the pages of the resume, everything for the next selective process since the current work will be only momentary. In the gift, in contrast of the described classroom of miners in Germinal, for Zola, what one meets are isolated people, esquizides, that they look at the not trustworthy colleague as somebody, not only for the fact of what other really it is, but, much more, for what it represents: suffering and pain. In the universe after-modern the ones are many that place very in secondary plan, or simply forget, the social people, classrooms, groups and movements, as well as chains of public opinion and the games them social forces …. In special, they forget the forms social organization and technique it work, understanding the conditions under which if they develop and they carry through the production, distribution, exchange and consumption, processes with which if it establishes a basic part of? plant? of the society, in national and world-wide scale (IANNI, 2000:74). Retroceding in History, as well as it suggests Marx (1996: 53), more dependent appears the individual, and, consequently also the producing individual and the set which belongs. Of beginning, this appears in a still sufficiently natural way, in the seio of the family and the tribe, this an extended family.