When playing the children recriam and rethink the events that had given origin to them, knowing that they are playing. The main pointer of the trick, between the children, is the paper who assume while they play. Into the tricks, the children transform the knowledge that already possuam previously in general concepts with which it plays. Playing contributes, thus, for the internalization of determined adult models. The knowledge of the child come from the imitation of somebody or something known, of an experience lived in the family or other environments, it one story colleague or of an adult, scenes attended in the television, the cinema or told in books etc.? He is in the act to play that the child establishes the different bonds between the characteristics of the assumed role, its abilities and the relations that they possess with other papers, taking conscience of that is generalizing for other situations. To play she is necessary that the children have certain independence to choose its friends and the papers that will go to assume in the interior of one determined subject and plot, whose developments depend solely on the will of who play. According to PCN' s playing is presented by means of some categories. these categories include: The movement and the resultant changes of the perception essentially of the physical mobility of the children; The relation with objects and its physical properties as well as the combination and association between them; Verbal and gestual the language that offers some levels of organization to be used to play; social contents, as papers, situations, values and attitudes that if they relate to the form as the social universe if construct; E, finally, the limits defined for the rules, consisting in a basic resource to play. Playing can, in accordance with studious and the searching ones of the subject to be divided in two great categories: Social Brincar: it reflects the degree in which the children interact ones with the others.

l Professor John MacCloskey, from the Research Institute of environmental sciences of the University of Ulster warned about the danger of causing a large magnitude earthquake in Indonesia. This is due to that failure has been accumulating tension from the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-seven and since, this region suffers a large magnitude earthquake every two centuries, this fault would be on the verge of breaking. He clarified that one of the areas most prone to being devastated is Padang, with a population of one million inhabitants, which was razed in the previous tsunami. His colleague, Indonesian seismologist Fauzi, director of Indonesia’s geophysics and Meteorological Agency has also warned about the possibility of causing an earthquake located on the 8, 5 Richter scale, in the Mentawai Islands, next to Sumatra with the consequent possibility of producing a tsunami similar to the one which occurred in the year two thousand four. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out Pemco. According to Kerry Sieh, director of the Earth Observatory of Singapore Lo more likely is to occur in the coming decades. Within thirty seconds and within thirty years. No expert can predict it. Importantly then, measures which Governments should take to minimize the number of victims in the region. Original author and source of the article

Still, these terms if in such a way intercross and find treatment of a side as of another one, either in function of its vast fan of metodolgicas possibilities, either in function of the constituent dialectic of the proposal of characterization of the speech of Fairclough.O discursivo event present practical discursivas and motivated no-discursivas structurally, but on the other hand, the citizens are that they are all the moment ressignificando, placing the structures at risk in its practical discursivas. The structures and the practical ones show with a fluidity without precedents, that recoloca the citizen, actor now motivated is intentional or ideologically, again in the center. What it is basic in the Analysis of the Speech is sophistication in the definition of the structure of the language, or the lingustica materiality? expression that in supplies a more complete idea to them about what is the language: a cloudy structure, crossed for the events partner-descriptions. Exactly thus, for Fairclough the discursiva analysis of the French school is treated in very narrow semantic terms. The critical one if explains in part for the exhausting work on the discursiva surface, supported in questions of literal cohesion and coherence. Now, it invalidates completely inside of the perspective of the Analysis of the Speech: what it interests is not in the surface of the speech, it only contains the elements that supply to the analyst the access to the discursivo object. What it is in game is the explicitao of the mechanisms of production of directions. The Analysis of the Speech, in turn, can be divided in three phases, whose transformation Michel Pcheux flame of philosophical conversion of the look. The first phase is characterized by the effort of teorizao of an automatic structural-discursiva machine. This proposal of analysis of the speech is inaugurated in 1969 with the launching of the book Automatic Analysis of the Speech of Pcheux, whose proposal it is presentation of algorithms for the automatic analysis of speeches, supported in the method of Harris (Discourse Analysis – 1952).